[B-Greek] Col 2.6 and 7 Passive participles after Active Imperative
mitchlarramore at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 20 09:45:12 EST 2006
> I'd take it more like continue what God has already
> started. God rooted, planted, and secured i.e. put
> you in Christ, now continue to do so.
What I'm trying to clear up is how participles that
"piggyback" on the finite verbs can modify an Active
Imperative and then 'switch' to a Passive sense.
Without some agent introduced, it seems like these
participles would take on the Middle sense by virtue
of modifying an Active finite verb. Then I was hoping
to determine if specific grammatical indicators
(Active voice finite verb and lack of hUPO with Gen)
play a role in determining how participles like this
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: Mitch Larramore <mitchlarramore at yahoo.com>
> > I am trying to understand how to take passive
> > participles (a Perfect and two Presents) that
> > immediately follow an active imperative.
> > hWS OUN PARELABETE TON CRISTON...EN AUTWi
> > ERRIZWMENOI KAI EPOIKODOMOUMENOI EN AUTWi KAI
> > BEBAIOUMENOI THi PISTEI KAQWS EDIDACQHTE....
> > The Colossians are urged to walk/live in the same
> > they received the Christ (I suppose that would be
> > faith). So, in what sense are these participles to
> > understood since they are passives? Can these be
> > understood as Middles, so that they should walk by
> > faith, thereby rooting themselves, building
> > themselves, and establishing themselves in this
> > The NET says this implies God's activity behind
> > scenes. Would it not be more 'natural' to take
> > "middle/passive" form participles as middles when
> > follow Active Imperatives? If so, do these
> > take on the imperative sense as well?
> > Mitch Larramore
> > Sugar Land, Texas
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the B-Greek