[B-Greek] AIWNION versus AIWNIAN for feminine
Carl W. Conrad
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
Tue Jun 6 06:04:05 EDT 2006
LSJ indicates that the 3-termination form is attested in Plato and
others, although it is rare. BDAG also indicates that the -IA
adjectival form appears in several LXX texts. So it would appear that
AIWNIOS is most generally a 2-termination adjective, but the feminine
form, although rare, is not unattested. Certainly there are other
deviations from a "standard" usage, particularly with words that may
not be part of one's everyday vocabulary. I've marveled at the fact
that AGALLIAOMAI, which is apparently middle in standard usage,
appears 11x in the GNT: 2x active, 8x middle, 1x passive -- and
without any evident distinction of meaning.
On Jun 6, 2006, at 4:48 AM, James Tauber wrote:
> The NT overwhelmingly seems to favour AIWNION as the feminine
> accusative singular of AIWNIOS.
> There are only two occasions in the NA/UBS text where the spelling
> AIWNIAN is used: 2Thess and Hebrews.
> Is there any historical or dialectal distinction outside the NT
> between the two forms?
> And any theories as to why, of all the Pauline corpus, only 2Thess
> uses the -AN form?
> (The phrase in 2Thess 2.16 is PARAKLHSIN AIWNIAN; in Hebrews 9.12
> AIWNIAN LUTRWSIN)
> James Tauber
> B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
1989 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
cwconrad2 at mac.com
More information about the B-Greek