LSJ on sale
hefinjones at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 17 17:30:11 EST 2003
As a little-KOINEgreek I have ALWAYS found it instructive to look at LSJ,
and Moulton-Milligan whenever I have been doing serious exegesis. BDAG and
its predecessors gave historical/secular uses in very condensed form. L&N
has its strengths, but is completely uninformative about secular greek. The
fact is a lexicographer can cut the semantic range of a given word in a
number of ways, and comparing entries in BDAG with LSJ can be enlightening.
The emphasis on secular greek also opens up interpretive possibilities which
"Biblical lexicography" tend to skew. I thought our brief thread on BAPTIZW
from a couple of months back might be illustrative of what can be learnt
from perusing what is admittedly a dated tool, whose lexical semantics might
not be fully up to scratch, but which is a vast compendium of data.
BD Student Moore College, Sydney
>From: "Eric S. Weiss" <eweiss at gte.net>
>I am all Koine, and have not taken a class in Classical Greek. I have the
>new BDAG, which I understand has greatly extended the lexical knowledge
>past BAGD so that perhaps some of the CL. Greek knowledge in LSJ (9) might
>be reflected in BDAG.
>I could spend $65 on LSJ (9) and not miss the money, but it seems that at
>my level of Greek knowledge, I don't need it and likely would have very
>little use for it, and that if I have to check Cl. Greek words, the
>Intermediate or Abridged editions (even though they're based on LS 8)
>would suffice, in conjunction with BDAG.
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*
More information about the B-Greek