[SM-Users] kernel compilation + initrd
David Brown
dmlb2000 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 18 15:47:07 EST 2007
On 3/18/07, Javier Vasquez <jevv.cr at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/17/07, David Brown <dmlb2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/17/07, Javier Vasquez <jevv.cr at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Yeah I just used /etc/modules cause it was there I probably should
> > > > change the script to add modules from a different file and the
> > > > initramfs spell should probably have a dependency on klibc since
> > > > that's kinda needed...
> > >
> > > Hmm, I tried casting klibc unsuccessfully:
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Yeah that's because klibc builds against the kernel version there it
> > needs to be updated to 1.5... I'm doing this now in test grimoire you
> > are fine to just change /var/lib/sorcery/codex/test/libs/klibc/DETAILS
> > to version 1.5 and I've verified that it works. Yeah sometimes I
> > forget to update stuff like klibc that compiles against the newest
> > kernel to make sure it works. The binaries work just fine but you
> > don't have those ;).
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback I'm putting some of the fixes you brought up
> > in the last email in the linux-initramfs spell (mkinitrd etc) now. You
> > should be able to get them < 6hours or so.
> >
> > - David Brown
>
> The 1.5 version change was right, only thing you pointed out testing,
> and the stable version, which is the one I'm using, required the
> change as well...
>
> I'll try initrd later then, in a few hours, :).
>
Ooo okay if you have stable this may need a little more work then,
might need to integrate the version bump for klibc to stable grimoire
then.
Thanks,
- David Brown
More information about the SM-Users
mailing list