[SM-Discuss] latex missing from texlive
ismael.luceno at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 21:38:54 EDT 2011
El Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:27:49 +0900
flux <flux at sourcemage.org> escribió:
> I'd rather like to know what texlinks is doing and perhaps we should
> do that ourselves. If all it's doing is setting up symlinks, why does
> there need to be an entirely separate binary for this? Why not just
> ln -s? This seems rather fishy. However, we definitely need to fix
> the INSTALL to do the right thing. I also have a feeling that this
> only affects latex/pdflatex (and possibly tex), but I'm not so sure
> about this. I'm fairly sure, though, that this doesn't affect context
> (which has it's own wrappers).
It was affecting ConTeXt on my system. In fact, it affected almost all
binaries (which I guess were wrappers).
I've tried a newer version and it looked a lot less broken, so I
upgraded the spell. It's missing some bits, but a lot better.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20110908/194c1fe7/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss