[SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject
dkowis at shlrm.org
Tue Sep 6 11:44:09 EDT 2011
On 09/06/2011 05:45 AM, Bor Kraljič wrote:
> We have new bug tracker now on chiliproject. We started without any bugs.
> Which is good since old bugzila had quite a few bugs to many:) But bugs on new
> issue tracker are piling up fast. We also have few "master" bugs. That brings
> me to the point of this email.
> In my opinion "master bug" should contain only short description of the
> problem. And subtasks with more information for each small problem should be
> created. (example http://sourcemage.org/issues/53) That way master bug offers
> transparent view of what has already been done and what we still need to do.
> Otherwise those bugs can really become hard to follow what has been done and
> what not. (example http://sourcemage.org/issues/30).
This is good advice in general to follow.
We can also take advantage of RoadMaps which make it easy to determine
what we're going to have in a release. Roadmaps can be shared amongst
projects as well, which can help us keep in sync if we have a release
that needs stuff in multiple projects to happen.
Keep up the good work :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 729 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20110906/67c8a8e3/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss