[SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?

Eric Sandall eric at sandall.us
Tue Apr 6 19:06:38 EDT 2010


Quoting flux <flux at sourcemage.org>:

> Eric Sandall (eric at sandall.us) wrote [10.04.07 07:50]:
>> Perhaps (partially taken and modified from
>> http://www.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Glossary, which we may need to
>> update if we decide on these (or other alterations)):
>> Member -> Guru
>>    General Developer -> Mage
>>      Lead Developer -> Elder
>>        Project/Component Lead -> Arch-wizard or Arch-mage
>>          Assistant -> Master
>>    Admin -> Sage
>>
>> -sandalle
>
> I'm guessing we should have a separate vote for these if we first vote
> on separating the lists?

I don't believe the Glossary requires an Issue Vote to change, it's  
more of a guide than a policy document.

-sandalle

-- 
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  http://counter.li.org/  #196285



More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list