[SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
eric at sandall.us
Tue Apr 6 19:06:38 EDT 2010
Quoting flux <flux at sourcemage.org>:
> Eric Sandall (eric at sandall.us) wrote [10.04.07 07:50]:
>> Perhaps (partially taken and modified from
>> http://www.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Glossary, which we may need to
>> update if we decide on these (or other alterations)):
>> Member -> Guru
>> General Developer -> Mage
>> Lead Developer -> Elder
>> Project/Component Lead -> Arch-wizard or Arch-mage
>> Assistant -> Master
>> Admin -> Sage
> I'm guessing we should have a separate vote for these if we first vote
> on separating the lists?
I don't believe the Glossary requires an Issue Vote to change, it's
more of a guide than a policy document.
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
More information about the SM-Discuss