[SM-Discuss] Castfs usage
treeve at scarlet.be
Sat Nov 28 11:38:18 EST 2009
On Thursday 26 November 2009 13:25:59 Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> I still see some people not using castfs. I'd like to know why? And I'd
> like to RFC if people think it would be good to make this a required
> dependency now.
> I've been using castfs myself for a long time and had no problems in
> ages. What's more spells can stop relying on install_config_file since
> sorcery now manages this itself if it's listed in configs.
> My proposal is do make castfs a requirement for sorcery now where
> possible. I know there's some 6 or 7 spells that still can't use it but
> everything else so far has.
> Also dmlb2000 proposed unison-fuse as a castfs replacement. I'm
> wondering if anyone else looked at it yet?
I now see this
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
19969 root 30 10 207m 6764 728 S 93 0.2 435:03.02 castfs
but all of my casts have long since finished !!
Also note the enormous time 435:03.02
I finally got rid of it with
# kill -9 19969
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20091128/56a7dff2/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss