[SM-Discuss] odbc spells

George Sherwood pilot at beernabeer.com
Mon May 4 15:29:02 EDT 2009


On Mon, 4 May 2009 21:17:40 +0200
Remko van der Vossen <wich at yuugen.jp> wrote:

> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:37:46AM -0500, George Sherwood wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 May 2009 18:25:33 +0200
> > Treeve Jelbert <treeve at scarlet.be> wrote:
> > > Most other distros seem to have patched qt4 to use libiodbc.
> > > 
> > > Would it upset any users of unixodbc, if we also went this route?
> > 
> > Would such a patch still allow unixodbc?  Hopefully we could still
> > use both, I am not an expert in this area though. 
> > 
> > You probably noticed that I had to patch qt4 to compile with recent
> > versions of unixodbc this weekend.
> 
> Is upstream aware of this situation, both the new unixodbc issue as
> well as the Soprano issue? Have they provided any view on the matter?

As far as the unixodbc issue there are three different bugs written:

http://www.qtsoftware.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=228194

http://www.qtsoftware.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=191151

http://www.qtsoftware.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=225004

None of them have any resolution written for them.

George

-- 
George Sherwood
Source Mage GNU/Linux Lead Developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20090504/88f2052f/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list