[SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?

Thomas Orgis thomas-forum at orgis.org
Tue Jun 30 22:13:28 EDT 2009


Am Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:32:09 +0200
schrieb Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz at gmx.net>: 

> The spec file is there so that the gcc frontend knows how to compile
> fortran programs (by calling gfortran). This is the same for all split
> gcc spells. In a normal setup where the whole suite is compiled at once,
> the specfile is built at compiletime including all that information.

Well, but obviously _something_ is wrong with our install in that area...
or are you able to compile a .f95 source file without forcing -xf95?
Does automatic preprocessing work for a .F90 file?

(I am aware of not very many people actually using gfortran...)


Alrighty then,

Thomas.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20090701/fe2d8e7b/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list