[SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO
Jaka Kranjc
smgl at lynxlynx.info
Tue Feb 24 08:03:14 EST 2009
On Tuesday 24 of February 2009 13:48:39 Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> :2009-02-24T07:41:flux:
> :
> > However, it was just an idea, and if nobody wants to run with it I don't
> > have a problem with that, as I'm not especially couched in the idea :) I
> > do agree that for trivial votes general developers should get binding
> > votes, but then we have an additional problem: defining what votes are
> > trivial and what votes are non-trivial.
>
> Why not just enable bug voting in bugzilla for such features and so on?
Because one user can assign more than one point and because you can't assign
negative points. Sure we could say the vote was succesful if the bug got 100
points in a week, but that doesn't tell us much about the votes (+100,
+200/-100, ...).
LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20090224/f9d09d14/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list