[SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO
Jaka Kranjc
smgl at lynxlynx.info
Tue Feb 24 04:03:58 EST 2009
On Tuesday 24 of February 2009 02:04:25 flux wrote:
> Ladislav Hagara (ladislav.hagara at unob.cz) wrote [09.02.23 19:50]:
> > Imho we need some quick and easy system for voting for and against some
> > of these decisions. Some of our decisions are only one man decision. :-(
>
> Although I don't know of any "one man decisions" that have happened in
> the distro recently, I think this is a good idea, and one that I have
> thought about before. One idea that I had was maybe creating a "vote"
> section in bugzilla and having votes tracked that way, since it would be
> easy to open issues for voting on. The problem with that would be making
> sure people didn't cheat the vote, but I guess the opening of a bug to
> vote on and the actual tracking of the votes could happen separately
> anyway.
We already have an accepted issue voting process, so why complicate the
matter? The only drawback I see, is that for trivial stuff, general
developers should have a binding vote too.
LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20090224/6a642454/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list