[SM-Discuss] ISO Build Complexities

Jaka Kranjc smgl at lynxlynx.info
Fri Sep 19 15:13:53 EDT 2008


On Friday 19 of September 2008 21:02:11 flux wrote:
> > I didn't claim it is the same thing. But if it works nicely, we should
> > just use it. The press couldn't hurt either.
>
> I have no problem with using it. I haven't had time to go through all of
> his scripts to see how well they can keep with updated ISOs (so that we
> can automatically generate up-to-date copies of his automatic
> installer).
That's for later. If it works, we can release it *now*. I'd like to ask anyone 
with spare machines to try it out (see [SM-Discuss] Patch available for the 
test3 iso to transform it into an automated installer iso) and report. As far 
as I know it was only tested in virtual machines.

> What "press" are you referring to though?
ISO release -> press. Especially this dw one.

LP

btw, it is not nice that you include the person's email directly when 
replying.
-- 
We cannot command nature except by obeying her.  --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080919/6260804c/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list