[SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED
Jaka Kranjc
smgl at lynxlynx.info
Thu Sep 11 11:45:21 EDT 2008
On Thursday 11 of September 2008 17:28:47 Vlad Glagolev wrote:
> > So I think all the responses we will most likely get are in?
>
> Too less people to do such serious moves.
Some six leads commented, how much more do you need besides the component
lead?
> And my revert is still proved,
> while your revert of my revert isn't.
hah?
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080911/25785d47/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list