[SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED

Jaka Kranjc smgl at lynxlynx.info
Thu Sep 11 11:04:45 EDT 2008


On Thursday 11 of September 2008 16:14:12 George Sherwood wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:26:25 -0700
>
> Eric Sandall <eric at sandall.us> wrote:
> > Moving forward, Vlad, would you please open a bug report with all of
> > the information you collected? That way we may track the issue and see
> > how widespread it is among our developers/users. George, is the latest
> > gtk+2 required for any of the updates you are working on? If not, may
> > we leave it reverted until the bug is resolved? If so, we will figure
> > out how to proceed (e.g. GNOME devel might just go to a devel-gnome
> > branch).
>
> Eric,
>    So I think all the responses we will most likely get are in?  So
> what do we do?  Seems more are in favor of reverting this revert than
> keeping the revert.
>
> Your call.
Actuallly we're waiting for Arwed, the current authority. ;)

LP
-- 
We cannot command nature except by obeying her.  --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080911/04e0af6a/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list