[SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED
Vlad Glagolev
stealth at sourcemage.org
Wed Sep 10 23:24:37 EDT 2008
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:18:27 -0500
David Kowis <dkowis at shlrm.org> wrote:
>
> Therefore, it shouldn't be reverted. Already we're evidencing that it
> doesn't affect anyone (Yet, I'll concede) but you. There's two people
> that don't have the problem, and one that does.
lol, of course! Cause i reverted it too fast, as i said before -- i just prevented the trouble
for the smgl users.
>
> Simple majority would say that it shouldn't be reverted.
>
lol
> The argument that it's "not a gcc/glibc bug" is that it doesn't affect
> the building of a system. Gcc/glibc are necessary to be working in a
> fully functional manner so that you can continue to build your system.
> They're part of our basesystem, and thus subject to more stringent
> requirements. gtk+2 isn't.
oic
>
> There were also two patches within that thread you referenced, but you
> only mentioned applying one of them.
>
> That's randrproto-1.3.patch:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/30661
>
> And another:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/30801
>
> Which patch did you apply?
the second, the first is for API changes that gnome guys need to know about
> And it appears that the patches would apply
> to xrandr, not xorg-server...
rofl :), xorg-server-1.4.2/randr/rrptoperty.c
--
Dont wait to die to find paradise...
--
Cheerz,
Vlad "Enqlave" Glagolev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080911/f999f26b/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list