[SM-Discuss] Tome nominations
Jeremy Blosser
jblosser-smgl at firinn.org
Wed Sep 3 16:06:53 EDT 2008
On Sep 02, Jaka Kranjc [smgl at lynxlynx.info] wrote:
> We have a documentation problem and we're not going to solve it by adding
> extra layers of complexity to the input system. We need all the help we can
> get, not just from experienced users that know how to code and use git. We
> try draft those sooner or later anyway. ;)
+1
BTW, I want git as an edit option but am not suggesting it would be the
required interface.
On Sep 02, Elisamuel Resto [samuel at dragonboricua.net] wrote:
> Mark, David and Jaka have pretty much expressed all my thoughts on the
> points brought up on the thread.
>
> I don't think this complexity is needed at this point (the starting
> point) but might be useful further down the line. Right now, the *only*
> thing I can see use for is the git-editing of the wiki files, and I
> doubt I'll use it constantly.
>
> LaTeX, DocBook, etc. will be useful when we have a set of documents that
> we might need them translated to $language and maintenance will start
> becoming a pain in the ass. I am more inclined towards DocBook rather
> than LaTeX at the moment, but that might change when I research further
> down the line.
Thanks, this is the kind of detail on your perspective I was looking for.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080903/b4fd11fe/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list