[SM-Discuss] neon, subversion & the stable grimoire
Elisamuel Resto
samuel at dragonboricua.net
Thu Oct 9 15:14:34 EDT 2008
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:01:33 +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> Neon is required for Subversion to support http checkouts, but
> subversion is picky about neon version. Stable 0.25-0 has neon 0.28.3
> and subversion 1.5.1 which are not compatible. Compatibility will
> eventually be needed for support of svn_http urls in sorcery, so really
> there should be some testing with subversion to help determine which
> version of neon goes into stable. This is not helped by the fact that
> subversion will fail to report an error if neon is requested but the
> version is not suitable. It will silently build without it.
>
> I would like to place a permanent warning in the neon spell to test that
> subversion definitely builds with neon in stable-rc before allowing
> inclusion into stable, or some words to that effect. I was thinking of
> placing the text as comments in DETAILS. Does this seem like a good idea
> to everyone? Does anyone have a better idea? Should a similar warning be
> placed in the subversion spell?
That would help, I assume. I say put it in. We got 6 days left for the
stable-rc-0.26 deadline, so it won't be an issue with stable for much longer.
--
Elisamuel Resto | GPG: 18615F19
samuel at dragonboricua.net | Source Mage GNU/Linux Tome Lead
http://simplysam.us/ | http://www.sourcemage.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20081009/7ae1ff07/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list