[SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?
eric at sandall.us
Mon Nov 17 19:24:07 EST 2008
Quoting seth at swoolley.homeip.net:
> Findutils was there first.
> Probably the best thing would be to make findutils install locate as
> findutils-locate and then POST_INSTALL a symlink.
> When mlocate or slocate are installed, set the correct symlink.
> I think we should standardize on an answer that can be referred to as a
> general policy. Normally we just set them as conflicting, but for
> basesystem findutils, that's not doable, so we need to come to an
> agreement that has to violate our principle of upstream sanctity one way
> or the other.
Our accepted default would be findutils and it's locate.
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
More information about the SM-Discuss