[SM-Discuss] Problem with cpio spell.
treeve at scarlet.be
Sat Nov 15 11:37:06 EST 2008
On Saturday 15 November 2008 16:46:15 Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Thomas Orgis wrote:
> > Btw: I am really tempted to resurrect the whole-in-one gcc spell.
> > It can save a lot of time when updating gcc/g++/gfortran in a row.
> We have a origin/devel-gcc-parallel branch that might be usable as well.
> It's to do with installing gcc as 686-linux-gcc and so on so that
> multiple versions could co-exist.
> As for the whole-in-one It would be nice to have both methods. And now
> that we have sub_depends it's do-able.
I have a local version of gcc which uses sub_depends, however it only works
for g++ and f95, not gcj. That is probably enough for most people. I use on
both x86 and x86-64. It saves me lots of time when building g++.
More information about the SM-Discuss