[SM-Discuss] Problem with cpio spell.
Eric Sandall
eric at sandall.us
Mon Nov 10 21:05:51 EST 2008
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:56:03 -0600
"Javier Vasquez" <jevv.cr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cpio didn't compile for me, so I look for its description (I didn't
> even know what was it about), and it said something like similar to
> tar but with some "buts" and "depends", so I decided to remove it.
> Problem is that basesystem spells requires it to compile as well (I
> didn't know until I dispelled cpio).
>
> So at the moment bassystem is broken... The problem with cpio was
> having multiple definitions for several functions. Has anyone seen
> this?
>
> Thanks,
Compiles fine here on x86 and x86_64 with the test grimoire and stable
grimoire. What version of glibc are yo using? 2.8 has some code cleanup
that not all packages have re-aligned with.
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20081110/71f0b885/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list