[SM-Discuss] Nominations for cauldron team lead as per voting policy
Eric Sandall
eric at sandall.us
Sun May 25 12:02:22 EDT 2008
On Sunday, May 25 2008 06:59:53 Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2008 12:57:02 +0200
>
> "Mathieu L." <lejatorn at smgl.homelinux.net> wrote:
> > I second Justin Boffemmyer (flux_control) nomination.
> >
> > Mathieu.
>
> As flux_control isn't yet a lead dev I'm proposing that we vote for him
> becoming a lead dev as well along the way. So here goes:
>
> I nominate flux_control for lead developer status. If he is seconded I
> move to vote for it immediately.
Ahh, I didn't read
http://www.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Developer_Organization, just
http://www.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Voting_Policy. ;) I *thought* Component
Leads *must* already be a Lead, but the voting didn't say so. The Developer
Organization does say this about Project and Component Leads: "are elected
from among the Lead Developers by a simple majority vote of the General +
Lead Developers."
I don't think Justin can run for Component Lead while is vote for Lead is
in-progress, since both votes take the same amount of time and one requires
the other to already be finished. Nonetheless, we can try it. :)
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080525/3955ecb6/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list