[SM-Discuss] policy for the VERSION of init.d
Thomas Orgis
thomas-forum at orgis.org
Wed Jun 11 03:35:16 EDT 2008
Am Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:04:46 +0000
schrieb Eric Sandall <eric at sandall.us>:
> Depends on who you're asking. :) The way I usually look at it is how the
> kernel used to do it (from http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/docs/kerncomp.php):
Well, this could inflate to a major discussion on "the right" version
scheme;-) I, for example, don't believe in even/odd scheme for
development versions; my development versions are in the scm repository -- (hopefully) stable releases get numbers.
My question was specific to the version of our init.d -- did it follow
this kernel policy?
Anyhow... we agree that next init.d version will be simply 3, followed
by 4, followed by 5...?
Alrighty then,
Thomas.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080611/1b40c44a/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list