[SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells
Jaka Kranjc
smgl at lynxlynx.info
Tue Jul 22 08:37:47 EDT 2008
Oh dear ...
I'm against introducing more tabs.
I like the formatting freedom we have.
When I do stuff, I have my own style, but I never do changes just to do
formatting changes.
If people are bothered by such changes, the alternatives to losing freedom
are:
* to exclude whitespace changes from the commit mails, which I already argued
about with David. It would cover other formatting changes, but these are a
bit less common.
* to have designated spell maintainers which dictate the style. Some section
maintainers already do it.
* things I haven't thought of
I'd like to see at least the separation of regular work and such "cleanups",
since they make reviewing sm-commit a lot harder.
LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080722/59b69dcb/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list