[SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells

Jaka Kranjc smgl at lynxlynx.info
Tue Jul 22 08:37:47 EDT 2008


Oh dear ...

I'm against introducing more tabs.

I like the formatting freedom we have.

When I do stuff, I have my own style, but I never do changes just to do 
formatting changes.

If people are bothered by such changes, the alternatives to losing freedom 
are:
* to exclude whitespace changes from the commit mails, which I already argued 
about with David. It would cover other formatting changes, but these are a 
bit less common.
* to have designated spell maintainers which dictate the style. Some section 
maintainers already do it.
* things I haven't thought of

I'd like to see at least the separation of regular work and such "cleanups", 
since they make reviewing sm-commit a lot harder.

LP
-- 
We cannot command nature except by obeying her.  --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080722/59b69dcb/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list