[SM-Discuss] Different network provider
David Kowis
dkowis at shlrm.org
Wed Jan 23 22:33:35 EST 2008
http://shlrm.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=grimoire/.git;a=summary
So I've spent some time replacing our network script system with the
same one that debian uses.
My reasoning is that it's more flexible and does more.
It doesn't require a great deal of knowledge to configure, and all the
man pages are included.
It greatly simplifies the init script as it replaces the start and stop
methods with ifup -a and ifdown -a
It's worked just fine for me in my xen vm, rebooted and I still had a
dhcp interface ;)
I'd like for you guys opinion on this, and perhaps we could integrate
it. The one time upgrade cost of it might be a bit high, but not really.
As the average user's interface is simply:
auto lo eth0
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet dhcp
--
David Kowis
==================================================================
| www.ronpaul2008.com | www.sourcemage.org |
| Ron Paul for President! | SourceMage GNU/Linux |
==================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ifupdownChanges.diff
Url: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080123/51286dab/attachment.pl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 727 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080123/51286dab/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list