[SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter
Jaka Kranjc
lynx at mages.ath.cx
Fri Jan 11 11:27:33 EST 2008
On Friday 11 of January 2008 17:29:21 Eric Sandall wrote:
> Shall we verify (non-strict) the tarball still matches the GPG and
> then re-sign with a cross-certified key?
Sounds practical. I guess my update fixed a few, since the newer keys were
already cross-certified.
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080111/b7405373/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list