[SM-Discuss] Conflicting spell and section names

Eric Sandall eric at sandall.us
Tue Jan 8 12:37:46 EST 2008


On Monday 07 January 2008 23:23:09 Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> I figured it was time to start a new thread for this.
>
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:36:13 -0800
>
> Eric Sandall <eric at sandall.us> wrote:
> > There should never be a name conflict between a section and a spell.
> > If so, one of them needs to be renamed.
>
> Bugs filed:
> #14206	master bug
> #14207	xfce
> #14208	compiz-fusion
>
> I tried to find out what the xfce spell is, exactly. I can't work it out
> without casting. It doesn't depend on anything else xfce, nor conflict with
> anything.

xfce is the 3.8 (old) version of XFCE, while the xfce section provides the 4.4 
(new) version of XFCE.

-sandalle

-- 
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  http://counter.li.org/  #196285
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080108/8e6e86c1/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list