[SM-Discuss] rename of e/ section grimoire
abouter at sourcemage.org
Wed Feb 27 10:16:59 EST 2008
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:07:19AM -0600, David Kowis wrote:
> Quoting Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara at unob.cz>:
> > Hi,
> > what do you think about it, especially Eric?
> > Personally I am happy with only one e section. I do not need more e sections.
> > Imho, to have more e sections is useless.
> > Of course if you prefer it, np.
> Is there anything that actually conflicts between e16 and e17?
> I kinda like the keywords idea.
I agree with the keywords, iirc most spells that are e16-only mention
this in the (short)description.
Source Mage GNU/Linux developer,
Registered as user #310617 with the Linux Counter,
GnuPG Key 79D4B14E = 94AD 3FD1 E259 67ED 632E 2B06 CFBE 1154 79D4 B14E
More information about the SM-Discuss