[SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0

Eric Sandall eric at sandall.us
Mon Apr 7 03:54:16 EDT 2008


On Sunday, April 06 2008 19:17:27 Eric Sandall wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 01 2008 21:03:46 Eric Sandall wrote:
> <snip>
>
> I'm not hitting this issue (no fix posted):
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32581
>
> Any ideas, or shall I deprecate Ada (for now) and push GCC 4.3.0? I'm in
> favor of this approach, unless there are any real people whom actually use
> this antiquated (invented before computers even existed!) language.
>
> -sandalle

Alright, I now have Ada 4.3.0 compiling on both x86 and x86_64, but using 
another bootstrap binary. I'm now working on building our own (and putting 
the instructions in HISTORY for future use ;)) and will submit all my GCC 
4.3.0 updates to test Real Soon Now(TM).

Note that this will *double* our supported architectures for Ada, which I hear 
many of you do not use, and no one should. ;)

-sandalle

-- 
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  http://counter.li.org/  #196285
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20080407/5ecd2873/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list