[SM-Discuss] glibc

Robin Cook rcook at wyrms.net
Fri Oct 27 16:59:40 EDT 2006


Been running it since it went into devel.

CuZnDragon
CuZnDragon

On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:29 +0200, Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:34, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > what is the status of glibc?
> >
> > $ gaze versions glibc
> > Grimoire    Section  Spell  Grimoire Version  Installed Version
> > git.devel   libs     glibc  2.4               2.4
> > grimoire    libs     glibc  2.3.6             -
> >
> >
> > I have been using glibc-2.4 for six months on my machines without any
> > problem.
> Great, then there is probably no reason to not bump it in test. Anyone else 
> tried it? I think at least George and Arwed did.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20061027/3efd9b23/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list