[SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells
astsmtl at gmail.com
Sat Oct 7 23:56:31 EDT 2006
> You didnt answer the question. Instead you picked a broader premise and
> re-framed the question within that (ignoring all other points and
> counterpoints made previously). Nice try though. Care to try again?
> Why does the force_depends version logic have to be in *sorcery*.
Sorry, i think you misunderstood me. This small chunk of code with
force_depends must live at the grimoire level. But if you decide that we
need some more generic solution, it goes into sorcery.
> That breaks one of the conditions mentioned in the currently utilized
> policy. Which is that all versions presented within the spell must work
> as dependencies. If they dont the spell must be split. So this is not
> a realistic example.
This condition is a limitation. I dont think that splitting spells with
different versions is a good thing.
sub_depends was great generic solution, solved some problems. IMHO
version_depends is equally imortant.
More information about the SM-Discuss