[SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote

Jason Flatt jflatt at sourcemage.org
Sun May 7 13:33:16 EDT 2006


On Friday 05 May 2006 11:06 am, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> I know Eric is busy with finals, so as APL I'm calling for a vote on the
> below amendment, as a more specific version of the suggested amendment
> proposed earlier today.
>
> Per the new policy[0], Leads should reply to the ML with signed +/- 1 or 0
> votes.  Other developers may vote as well, but only Lead votes are binding.
> The vote will last until 1PM CDT May 12th, or until a majority approves or
> rejects it, whichever comes first.  This vote affects the voting policy, so
> any lead or other developer can move for a veto at the end of the vote,
> regardless of the results.
>
> [0] - Not yet on the web site, but we're working on having it there today.
>


+1 from me, also.


-- 
Jason Flatt
Source Mage GNU/Linux: Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic.
http://www.sourcemage.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20060507/2dbebc88/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list