[SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my
jblosser-smgl at firinn.org
Sun May 7 11:21:45 EDT 2006
On May 07, Eric Sandall [eric at sandall.us] wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > ruskie pointed out apprentice was missing from the glossary, I'll add that
> > there but I'm not entirely sure how to define it if we aren't expecting to
> > keep a standing devel grimoire. I guess we will still have devel for
> > sorcery and cauldron... maybe we can just keep the apprentice/mentor
> > relationship going for those that want it and have them submit patches
> > instead of directly to devel. Or we could let them do their own WIP devel
> > branches.
> I'd say let them submit patches or, if using git, let them publish their
> own grimoire with their changes which their mentor can pull from, or
> they can use the devel branch in our git repo and their mentor can
> cherry-pick from there.
Arwed is become more and more convinced we won't *have* a standing devel
branch in git (or whatever scm). We'll have per-WIP temp branches when
needed. Of course, they could have access to create and commit to these
just like anyone else.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20060507/8f1ebb07/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss