[SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my

Juuso Alasuutari iuso at sourcemage.org
Sun May 7 11:01:57 EDT 2006


On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:48, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
>             general dev    lead dev
>            -----------    --------
>  generic  : mage        -> archmage
>
>  cauldron : wizard      -> archwizard
>  grimoire : guru        -> warlock
>  sorcery  : wizard      -> archwizard
>  tome     : scribe      -> sage
>
> and reserve the "elder" for project/component leads

So far I prefer this suggestion most. It's logical and least confusing to have 
mage->archmage and wizard->archwizard. Also scribe->sage as sandalle 
suggested is definitely the best option.

I still don't know about guru->warlock, I think that those could also be 
something similar to wizard->archwizard. I can't think of any replacement, 
though. Maybe they're not too bad.

-- 
        Juuso Alasuutari
[[ Source Mage GNU/Linux ]]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20060507/b859c838/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list