[SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my
Juuso Alasuutari
iuso at sourcemage.org
Sun May 7 11:01:57 EDT 2006
On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:48, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> general dev lead dev
> ----------- --------
> generic : mage -> archmage
>
> cauldron : wizard -> archwizard
> grimoire : guru -> warlock
> sorcery : wizard -> archwizard
> tome : scribe -> sage
>
> and reserve the "elder" for project/component leads
So far I prefer this suggestion most. It's logical and least confusing to have
mage->archmage and wizard->archwizard. Also scribe->sage as sandalle
suggested is definitely the best option.
I still don't know about guru->warlock, I think that those could also be
something similar to wizard->archwizard. I can't think of any replacement,
though. Maybe they're not too bad.
--
Juuso Alasuutari
[[ Source Mage GNU/Linux ]]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20060507/b859c838/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list