[SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my

Eric Sandall eric at sandall.us
Sat May 6 20:08:32 EDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> To pull a few of these threads into one...
<snip>
> To resolve that question and get on with things, I'm suggesting we add a
> few more cloaks/title so that basically each component has a general
> developer and a lead developer title available, and then we can say that
> you can be listed on the developer page and cloaked using whichever title
> you want from among the components you have access to.  Karsten can
> basically manage our cloaks for us now (and is one of the ones asking for
> this ;P) so it shouldn't be an issue with freenode.  Proposed cloaks:

I would propose the two following changes:

>            general dev    lead dev
>            -----------    --------
> generic  : mage        -> elder
> 
> cauldron : wizard      -> warlock
> grimoire : guru        -> ??? sage?
                            archwizard
> sorcery  : wizard      -> warlock
> tome     : ??? scribe? -> ??? bard?
                            sage

Sage usually holds knowledge for others to reference/ask about, which
would fit more the Tome Team (documentation, website, forums, etc.) to
me. :)

Archwizard just sounds cool (and I wanted to use sage for Tome ;)).
<snip>

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEXTqAHXt9dKjv3WERAjbsAJ9wdZqA4YXDL8HLfkGuu72mxeSzgwCgjQ4Z
OR0d6dq7YK8U9m3LqwmH6hg=
=AbTc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list