[SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote
dkowis at shlrm.org
Sat May 6 12:51:41 EDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> I know Eric is busy with finals, so as APL I'm calling for a vote on the
> below amendment, as a more specific version of the suggested amendment
> proposed earlier today.
> Per the new policy, Leads should reply to the ML with signed +/- 1 or 0
> votes. Other developers may vote as well, but only Lead votes are binding.
> The vote will last until 1PM CDT May 12th, or until a majority approves or
> rejects it, whichever comes first. This vote affects the voting policy, so
> any lead or other developer can move for a veto at the end of the vote,
> regardless of the results.
>  - Not yet on the web site, but we're working on having it there today.
So if we're actually voting on this.
I'll vote +1
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the SM-Discuss