[SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
ruskie at mages.ath.cx
Thu May 4 18:18:31 EDT 2006
Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :
> Well, I guess I should ask, what exactly do we want to call these groups on
> the web sites? The docs call them 'Lead Developers' and 'General
> Developers'; do we want to stick with that or something like 'Council of
> Elders' and 'Council of Developers' (or 'Council of Mages' (or 'Council of
> Gurus'))?
>
Conucil of Elders for Elders
That's our naming for the leads...
We really should support our naming scheme in everything...
I'd also recommend for our grimoire naming to be different as well.
This would help differentiate from sorcery branches for new users
and add that bit of extra++ to the names...
--
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html
Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003 CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list