[SM-Discuss] gcc 4.0.1 complaints
lejatorn at smgl.homelinux.net
Tue Mar 28 12:53:07 EST 2006
ok, so how about making some kind of ml where all the devs could post
Then someone could be in charged of analysing these. I don't think this
task should go the grimoire lead as it seems quite huge...
just my 2 cents.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 11:36:02AM -0600, David Kowis wrote:
> Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > Casting the whole grimoire would obviously be a good test, but it just
> > doesn't work without some massive test cluster to do this on. We have
> > over 4000 spells in the grimoires, even if most of them only take a
> > couple of minutes, we're still taking about weeks of compile time.
> > What I was thinking of was more something like: gather the info from the
> > logs that are available anyway, aggregate it, then look at that list to
> > figure out what spells still need explicit testing. Basically spread the
> > testing burden to several developers and machines, getting everything
> > that gets cast by one of us anyway out of the way to figure out a list
> > of less used spells to test.
> Okay, that is a very good idea. All the points that have been made are
> very good. I'm simply too ignorant to realize the scope of things. I'm
> going to blame it on Monday.
> David Kowis
> ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
> Source Mage GNU/Linux
> Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
> find easier ways to do something.
> - Robert Heinlein
> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
> - Arthur C. Clarke
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss at lists.ibiblio.org
More information about the SM-Discuss