[SM-Discuss] gcc 4.0.1 complaints
David Kowis
dkowis at shlrm.org
Mon Mar 27 12:36:02 EST 2006
Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> Casting the whole grimoire would obviously be a good test, but it just
> doesn't work without some massive test cluster to do this on. We have
> over 4000 spells in the grimoires, even if most of them only take a
> couple of minutes, we're still taking about weeks of compile time.
> What I was thinking of was more something like: gather the info from the
> logs that are available anyway, aggregate it, then look at that list to
> figure out what spells still need explicit testing. Basically spread the
> testing burden to several developers and machines, getting everything
> that gets cast by one of us anyway out of the way to figure out a list
> of less used spells to test.
Okay, that is a very good idea. All the points that have been made are
very good. I'm simply too ignorant to realize the scope of things. I'm
going to blame it on Monday.
--
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20060327/1c460097/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list