[SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement
baux at sourcemage.org
Thu Mar 16 10:25:41 EST 2006
On 2006-03-16 15:51:59 +0100 David Kowis <dkowis at shlrm.org> wrote:
> Before this gets too much into harping on individual SCM's I'm going
> point out that BearPerson and I had a lengthy discussion over SVN vs
if SCM should be changed (from p4 to something else) should be a
choice done by vote from sourcemage developers (all teams, from
cauldron to grimoire, sorrcery etc...)
> My point here is, any SCM can be made to do what we want it to do.
> focus will be what does it the easiest, fastest, lowest learning
> and is the most stable. So, I'm going to recommend against the simple
> "yeah <insert scm here> does that" and instead ask that it's said how
> it's done and what steps are involved.
> In the svn vs bzr example, there's like 3 or 4 steps to doing a
> changeset in svn, but in bzr it's only one or two.
in gnuarch to in one or two steps (bzr is a gnuarch fork :) )
> My two cents.
mine too :))
GPG key: 0xCC0FBF8F
=> E429 A37C 5259 763C 9DEE FC8B 5D61 C796 CC0F BF8F <=
More information about the SM-Discuss