[SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement

Robert Figura rfigura at aubergine.zwischengesicht.de
Thu Mar 16 09:10:17 EST 2006


Am Wednesday 15 March 2006 17:25 schrieb Sergey A. Lipnevich:

> Also, this article is quite interesting:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/74355

Quite interesting, indeed. I'd like to second the problem of potential 
developers jumping off the train because of p4. Also i see a lot of gain in 
using a distributed scm.

The main question to me remains what are the requirements to a scm to be 
used on grimoires. I personally have switched to mercurial after using cvs 
for ten years. I like it because it is small (spell: lacks features). Also 
because it's implementation seems quite clean to me and also is small.

I can imagine that the lack of features may be a problem but i can't reach 
the argument. I'd be happy if someone could point out what features are 
used for what purposes. I think this might be of public interest and worth 
to put it on the list.

Hm. I should work on getting devel access again :)

Regards
  - Robert Figura

-- 
/* mandlsig.c v0.23  (c) by Robert Figura */
I=1702;float O,o,i;main(l){for(;I--;putchar("oO .,\nm>cot.bitamea\
@urigrf <raguFit erobR"[I%74?I>837&874>I?I^833:l%5:5]))for(O=o=l=
0;O*O+o*o<(16^l++);o=2*O*o+I/74/11.-1,O=i)i=O*O-o*o+I%74*.04-2.2;}



More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list