vlaaad at sourcemage.org
Tue Mar 14 04:14:09 EST 2006
Le lundi 13 mars 2006 à 15:09 -0400, Rafael George a écrit :
> Hi guys i know the section is a bit out of date im working on it, i
> don't have a good internet connection at home thats why im making
> changes without commiting, but this is email is just for letting you
> know im thinking in change the spells name on perl-cpan from
> <module-name> to perl-<module-name> don't know if this is a good idea
> but as i saw pear-php and gkrellm stuff too i think is faster for
> users to use tab completion.
> any suggestion ?
I'm strongly in favour of such a renaming, almost for library bindings.
I think this is much clearer and that can also prevent conflict names
when we add new spells. For example, when I created the spell for
gstreamer bindings, that was obvious for me to call it perl-gstreamer to
distinguish it from the gstreamer spell. For all API bindings in perl we
have this problem anyway, so this is better imho to have a true rule for
that. See for example the spell gtk+ and gtk. The first is the C
library, and the second the perl bindings. I really don't find this very
intuitive... ;-) For GTK+2, this is better : gtk+2 for the real library,
and perl-gtk2 for the perl bindings... Doesn't it look better ? :)
Disk, Graphics, Graphics-libs sections Guru
Source Mage GNU/Linux - http://www.sourcemage.org
jabber: vlaaad at amessage.be
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20060314/a2af5ebd/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss