[SM-Discuss] A new config_query
jflatt at sourcemage.org
Tue Mar 7 16:53:49 EST 2006
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 09:37 am, Eric Sandall wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> > It seems there is a tiny issue with the name for some people so I'm
> > asking for your opinion.
> > Which do you prefer:
> > 1) Don't care as long as it works
> > 2) config_query_checkbox
> > 3) config_query_multi
> > 4) config_query_multi_list
> > Atm this function isn't really used anywhere so now it's the time to
> > speak up.
> I like config_query_multi, though config_query_multi_list might be
> more appropriate (though longer). The only reason I dislike
> config_query_checkbox is that, to me, it implies a dialog (or similar)
config_query_multi sounds ambiguous to me (multi what?). I agree about
config_query_checkbox. So my out-numbered :^) vote would be for
config_query_multi_list, or config_query_multilist, if the other is too
Source Mage GNU/Linux: Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 483 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20060307/929b5bfb/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss