[SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) jblosser-smgl at firinn.org
Wed Mar 1 14:27:42 EST 2006


On Mar 01, Eric Sandall [eric at sandall.us] wrote:
> If others (mainly Ladislav) think this is a good idea I can go
> implement this (being as I'm the one who made the 'mess' ;)).
> 
> Idea so far (AFAIK):
>    * Rename enlightenment to e16
>    * Keep e17 named e17
>    * Write an e16-profile package
>    * Write an e17-profile package
>    * Have the e-profile package look at current variables and
>      'convert' the installation to e16|e17. Normal e-profile
>      install will allow either or both e16/e17 installed.
> 
> What to do with the current enlightenment spell? Some may say to have
> that be e17, but then when e18 comes out we'll run into the same
> problems (when e17 binaries/scripts become renamed to e17 instead of
> enlightenment, as e16 is now doing, and e18 has the name
> enlightenment).

e16 -> actual enlightenment DR16
e17 -> actual enlightenment DR17

enlightenment -> fake spell that asks which e they want then depends on one
of the above 2 (try to determine which e they use and default to that one,
else default to e16)

e16-profile -> profile spell for e16 + other related stuff
e17-profile -> profile spell for e17 + other related stuff

enlightenment-profile (or e-profile) -> fake spell that asks which e they
want then depends on one of the above 2 (try to determine which e they use
and default to that one, else default to e16)

IMO.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20060301/1ee6d4ae/attachment.bin 


More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list