[SM-Discuss] my summary
ladislav.hagara at unob.cz
Thu Feb 16 11:43:35 EST 2006
is for a totally open voting process.
would like to know (not generally but real names) who is against it.
prefers more transparent decision-making (polling: +1, -1, ...).
regrets that some developers leave us due to non-transparency.
wonder why discussion about reorganization if we have only few active
appreciates the work of active smgl developers (p4 users | grep 2006).
would like to welcome new active smgl developers.
nominates Sergey A. Lipnevich for a PL.
was/is against the guru gpg signed spells checking.
agree with vendor signed spell checking.
would add the smgl hash to vendor signature.
was/is against the splitting up the enlightenment spell to e17 and
More information about the SM-Discuss