[SM-Discuss] Grimoire for deprecated spells

David Kowis dkowis at shlrm.org
Mon Aug 14 16:52:39 EDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> This would be for spells that:
> a) don't have upstream support(this is basicaly a must)
Okay that's good and defined.

> b) fail to build, relevant to point a
Good criteria too.

> c) bitrotten stuff, relevant to point a
How do we define bitrotten? Doesn't that typically equate to "fails to
build" ?

> d) fail to run properly even if they run, relevant to point a
> e) are simply not used anylonger(I think gnome1 fits in here)
As long as we still fix bugs against the "deprecated" grimoire, this is
okay. If it's gonna just sit there and rot, then it's not good criteria.
If we're going to use this for stuff that's just seldomly used, then
that's okay. If it's for stuff that's dead or broken, it's not good.

- --
David Kowis

ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux

Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
  - Robert Heinlein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
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=8/IE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list