[SM-Discuss] Cups and Ghostscript . . .
Jason Flatt
jflatt at sourcemage.org
Tue Sep 27 01:50:28 EDT 2005
On Monday 26 September 2005 09:27 am, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
>
> So this is the program?
>
> espgs-cups will depend on cups and use --with-cups.
Yes, but the two programs would be encapsulated within a single spell, so that
the separate cups spell would not be cast.
> espgs will not depend on cups and use --without-cups.
>
> espgs and espgs-cups will conflict with and be providers of GHOSTSCRIPT
> (along with other GHOSTSCRIPT providers).
>
> cups will not depend on either, but a note will be entered to tell
> people to cast espgs-cups. We don't really need cups to know about
> espgs or espgs-cups beforehand.
>
> Is that the gist?
I think so, except for that first part, which makes me wonder about that last
part and if you're thinking down a different path than I am.
--
Jason Flatt
Source Mage GNU/Linux: Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic.
http://www.sourcemage.org/
jflatt at sourcemage.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20050926/6c207bdf/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list