[SM-Discuss] impending stable-rc -> stable and test -> stable-rc integration
Arwed von Merkatz
v.merkatz at gmx.net
Tue May 24 15:48:22 EDT 2005
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:58:11AM -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> * Developers:
> Just a notice that if you want anything in stable for the next round, it
> should be in test grimoire within the next few hours.
> * Everybody:
> Secondly, if you have anything to say about the quality of stable-rc,
> you have 24 hours to speak up or forever hold your peace.
Are there any known issues with the new binutils and glibc compiles? I
know glibc fails on gcc 4.0 systems even if using gcc 3.4, but so far I
haven't heard of any failures on gcc 3.4 systems.
> * I have draft release notes here:
> If nobody replies with a major issue (implying regression) in 24 hours,
> Stable 0.0 Grimoire will be released to the world.
> So long, and thanks for all the testing,
> Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
> Key id 00BA3AF3 = 8BE0 A72E A47E A92A 0737 F2FF 7A3F 6D3C 00BA 3AF3
> Quality Assurance Team Leader; Security Team Member, Leader Emeritus
> Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
> Elected Coordinating Committee Member, Secretary, and Finances Chair
> Pacific Green Party of Oregon - Peace - http://www.pacificgreens.org
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss at lists.ibiblio.org
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
More information about the SM-Discuss