[SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire
Arwed von Merkatz
v.merkatz at gmx.net
Tue Feb 22 14:34:12 EST 2005
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:53:00AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Seth Alan Woolley <seth at positivism.org>:
> > Arwed, Eric, shall I do this? How long after I do this do we bump gcc
> > 3.4.x to test?
> I'd say glibc is just about ready for stable if we don't receive any more
> reports of breakage by tomorrow (February 23, 2005).
> As for gcc, I believe it's ready to go as well except for it breaking the
> compilation of openoffice. Arwed?
I was thinking of waiting until glibc hits the stable grimoire before
getting gcc to test so the stable users don't have two major upgrades at
the same time. Not sure what to do with it breaking openoffice. How many
people are actually crazy enough to compile that beast from source?
Other than that gcc 3.4 can go in as soon as the glibc update in stable
>  http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6527
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
More information about the SM-Discuss