[SM-Discuss] New sections [Was: New archive and perl-cpan maintainer]
jblosser-smgl at firinn.org
Tue Feb 22 12:56:44 EST 2005
On Feb 22, Eric Sandall [eric at sandall.us] wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Houssin <thomas.houssin at gmail.com>:
> > So we have several ideas to split the utils section :
> > Does this seems a good idea to everybody ? Other ideas ?
I actually started yesterday on a full list of new sections out of
utils+shell-term-fm. I think I'm 2/3 of the way there.
> Looks fine to me, though utils looks like it'll still be a catch-all and
> rather large while some of the sections (admintools, don't have spaces in
> section names ;)) will be fairly small. Do we have problems with small
> sections? Are there any other items we can/will add to the admintools
The list I'm working on now does not have a "utils" section anymore. It
has quite a few sections, some of which are rather small at the moment...
my thought is to just categorize everything however makes sense, then send
it to the list for discussion with the assumption some of the smaller ones
can get recombined.
I'll try to send a full draft out tomorrow night; if I don't have it done
by then I'll just send whatever I have.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20050222/c9bd805f/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss